http://www.vikingvigil.com/2009/02/rumor-central-nate-washington%e2%80%a6a-viking/ A Minnesota Vikings Blog Sun, 15 Aug 2010 15:35:19 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 http://www.vikingvigil.com/2009/02/rumor-central-nate-washington%e2%80%a6a-viking/comment-page-1/#comment-377 Andrew Sat, 28 Feb 2009 04:22:40 +0000 http://www.vikingvigil.com/?p=448#comment-377 Yes, I agree. We need a possession receiver worse, but Washington would really help stretch the field. Most teams only have one great coverage person, so besides the fact that one of the deep-threats will be open, the mid- to short-field will be open as well. This will make life easier on Peterson and Taylor. Yes, I agree. We need a possession receiver worse, but Washington would really help stretch the field. Most teams only have one great coverage person, so besides the fact that one of the deep-threats will be open, the mid- to short-field will be open as well. This will make life easier on Peterson and Taylor.

]]> http://www.vikingvigil.com/2009/02/rumor-central-nate-washington%e2%80%a6a-viking/comment-page-1/#comment-376 drewhatfield Sat, 28 Feb 2009 03:36:42 +0000 http://www.vikingvigil.com/?p=448#comment-376 I would like to see nate washington in minnesota. Having two burners would open the field up so much and allow us to call more big hitting plays. I hope we get him. I would like to see nate washington in minnesota. Having two burners would open the field up so much and allow us to call more big hitting plays. I hope we get him.

]]>